Category

pc optimization expert

Scan Speed Benchmark – Software Testing Weekly #5

By | blog, pc optimization expert

Scan speed benchmark of the latest versions

This scan speed benchmark test case came to mind after the latest version of jv16 PowerTools 2017 has been released. We then decided to test the actual scan speed versus number of errors found for the latest three public versions of the Clean and SpeedUp My Computer tool.

Why this test now?

On the occasion of releasing jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.1.0.1728 it seemed like the perfect opportunity to fill a Windows 10 virtual machine with residual registry and file system data, then compare the performance of our latest three publicly released scanner versions.

Using this scan speed benchmark, we hope to show the differences in terms of scanner speed (the latest version of jv16 PowerTools 2017 is very fast) and how we managed to obtain it (faster speed most of the times means lower accuracy).

The “crap.reg” registry file imported to the test system contains over 10000 unique registry and file system orphaned entries and other errors of various severity levels.

We use such test data to ensure the fact that the latest version of our scanner does not have any false positives. This will be the subject of an upcoming quality testing report as part of the weekly test routines.

Tested jv16 PowerTools versions

The following jv16 PowerTools 2017 versions have been tested:

  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.10.1689
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.10.1703
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.10.1728

To download the latest version of jv16 PowerTools, always go to: https://www.macecraft.com/download/

Test Cases

The objective of this one-off test case was set to:

  • Test Case #1: Compare the volume of Registry Errors, Temp Files and History Data found versus the overall Clean and SpeedUp My Computer scanner speed between latest three publicly released versions.

The information on which this test case relies is provided by the ML_CSMC_Scan log file, which can be found in the ‘Backups’ folder of your jv16 PowerTools 2017 installation path.

Test Environment

The current benchmark test was performed using an Oracle VirtualBox (version: 5.1.22 r115126) virtual environment running Windows 10 with 4 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM assigned.

Said virtual machine was run on a host computer running Ubuntu Linux 17.04 LTS (64 bit) with an Intel-i5 processor, 20 GB of DDR3 virtual memory and a SSD system disk.

Such an ordinary test environment was created and used in order to simulate the easiest conditions that can be reproduced by any software consumer to verify the validity of these tests.

Verifiability

All of the past and current test results are accompanied by screenshots and/or video recordings which have been saved during various testing phases in order to address some of the most common test result credibility concerns for this type of studies.

Test Case #1: Summary

→ scan speed for the latest versions of jv16 PowerTools

Below you can find the actual scan speed benchmark scores recorded by each of the tested jv16 PowerTools versions:

  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1689 completed scanning using Clean and SpeedUp My Computer in 160 seconds
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1703 completed scanning using Clean and SpeedUp My Computer in 244 seconds
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1728 completed scanning using Clean and SpeedUp My Computer in 95 seconds

The latest version of jv16 PowerTools 2017 (version 4.1.0.1728) completed scan of the entire system much faster than any of the other two latest public versions.

→ number of errors found using the latest versions of jv16 PowerTools

Below you can find the total number of errors found by each of the tested jv16 PowerTools versions:

  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1689 found a total of 12235 system issues
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1703 found a total of 12281 system issues
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 build 1728 found a total of 12174 system issues

Scan Speed Benchmark: conclusions

The latest version of jv16 PowerTools 2017 – build 1728 found only 0.87% less system issues than the previous public version while it is more than twice as fast.

Related weekly benchmark test reports:

Wider benchmark test reports:

Since February of 2009 (when the first test of this kind was done in our lab), Macecraft Software has published a total of seven registry cleaner product comparison studies:

Anti-Exploit Kit Benchmark – Software Testing Weekly #4

By | blog, pc optimization expert

Anti-Exploit Kit Benchmark

The current anti-exploit kit benchmark is the expression of following our customers closely and taking their recommendations seriously, no matter how out-of-the-box they might be at first sight!

Why this test now?

The idea is based on a message received from one of our existing customers:

“Because jv16PT is not a spyware/malware product it would not fare well – Indeed, it is an unfair comparison; however, I have seen dramatic performance improvements once these products have been run.”

As our customers are usually power users, this gut feeling was taken to the testing lab in an attempt to determine the effects that these software products may have on the overall system performance after used to perform their primary scope.

Anti-Exploit Kit Benchmark: Tested Products

This week, we took into consideration the suggestion of one of our customers and started on a test case journey to determine PCMark 10 benchmark scores (while ignoring GPU requirements) for a Windows 10 system, before and after using the following products:

  • SuperAntiSypware Professional Trial v.6.0.1244
  • Malwarebytes Premium Trial v.3.1.2
  • jv16 PowerTools 2017 v.4.1.0.1728

Test Cases involving PCMark 10 Benchmark

The objective of this test was set to record the PCMark 10 benchmark scores of a virtual Windows 10 computer, under the following test case scenarios:

  • Test Case #1: Before installing and using any of the third party common software (Windows 10 fresh)
  • Test Case #2: Before installing and using any of the tested PC system utilities (Windows 10 fresh + common software installed)
  • Test Case #3: With third party software installed, after installing and using SuperAntiSpyware
  • Test Case #4: With third party software installed, after installing and using MalwareBytes
  • Test Case #5: With third party software installed, after installing and using jv16 PowerTools 2017

PCMark 10 Benchmark: Test Environment

The current benchmark test was performed using an Oracle VirtualBox (version: 5.1.22 r115126) virtual environment running Windows 10 with 4 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM assigned. Said virtual machine was run on a host computer running Ubuntu Linux 17.04 LTS (64 bit) with an Intel-i5 processor, 20 GB of DDR3 virtual memory and a SSD system disk.

Such an ordinary test environment was created and used in order to simulate the easiest conditions that can be reproduced by any software consumer to verify the validity of these tests.

PC System Benchmarks: Verifiability

All of the past and current test results are accompanied by screenshots and/or video recordings which have been saved during various testing phases in order to address some of the most common test result credibility concerns for this type of studies.

Test Case #1: Summary

→ freshly installed Windows 10 with no third party software

In the first test case we measured the PCMark 10 score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose.

We did not yet install any of the most common software used today. The reason for this extra benchmark score (before installing any other third party software products) is to determine a baseline benchmark score for a freshly installed Windows 10, according to the PCMark 10 Benchmark software.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #1

On a freshly installed and updated Windows 10, PCMark 10 has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • PCMark 10 Essentials Benchmark score: 4020
  • PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score: 3718

Test Case #2: Summary

→ freshly installed Windows 10 with popular software installed

In the first test case we measured the PCMark 10 score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose. In the second test case of this week, we recorded the PCMark 10 score for a Windows 10 system with some of the most popular software installed.

The system in this test case was neither cleaned or optimized using any of the tested software (SuperAntiSpyware, Malwarebytes, jv16 PowerTools).

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #2

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installedPCMark 10 has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • PCMark 10 Essentials Benchmark score: 3369
  • PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score: 3674

Test Case #3: Summary

→ after using SuperAntiSpyware

The system in this test case was cleaned using SuperAntiSpyware Professional Trial v.6.0.1244.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #3

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed, after the system was cleaned using SuperAntiSpywarePCMark 10 has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • PCMark 10 Essentials Benchmark score: 2878
  • PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score: 3615

Test Case #4: Summary

→ after using Malwarebytes

The system in this test case was cleaned using Malwarebytes Premium Trial 3.1.2.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #4

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed, after the system was cleaned using MalwarebytesPCMark 10 has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • PCMark 10 Essentials Benchmark score: 3118
  • PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score: 3482

Test Case #5: Summary

→ after using jv16 PowerTools

The system in this test case was cleaned and optimized using jv16 PowerTools 2017 v.4.1.0.1728.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #5

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed, after the system was cleaned and optimized using jv16 PowerToolsPCMark 10 has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • PCMark 10 Essentials Benchmark score: 3383
  • PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score: 3858

PCMark 10 Benchmark: conclusions

After using jv16 PowerTools, Windows 10 (with popular software installed) obtains a PCMark 10 Productivity Benchmark score which is slightly higher than the score obtained on a fresh Windows 10 system (with no third party software installed).

Even if this comparison is not necessarily fair, as our customer also mentioned during the recommendation of such a test, it is still interesting to see the effects that popular software have on computing performance.

Related weekly benchmark test reports:

Other benchmark test reports:

Since February of 2009 (when the first test of this kind was done in our lab), Macecraft Software has published a total of seven registry cleaner product comparison studies:

PCMark 10 Benchmark Alternatives – Software Testing Weekly #3

By | blog, pc optimization expert

Introducing PCMark 10 Benchmark

The new PCMark 10 benchmark software was released only few days ago by Futuremark Corporation.  On this occasion, we wanted to compare scores obtained by a Windows 10 system, before and after cleaning with CCleaner and jv16 PowerTools.

Why this test now?

Last week we tested the PCMark 8 benchmark score obtained by a Windows 10 system before and after cleaning and optimizing it with CCleaner and then with jv16 PowerTools.

While PCMark 8 was never advertised by Futuremark Corporation as a fully compatible benchmarking solution for Windows 10, we wanted to take the new PCMark 10 for a spin. The results of the PCMark 10 benchmark have been compared with last week’s PCMark 8 benchmark score results for the same test case scenarios.

Tested Products

In ‘Software Testing Weekly #2‘ we looked at the top competitor (according to Google.com search results for “registry cleaner”) and decided to see the PC system benchmarks score impact (if any) before and after using the said product: CCleaner.

In last week’s tests, we used CCleaner Professional. For this week, we decided to visit the ‘Builds’ page of CCleaner and choose a different, lighter version, in order to offer CCleaner all the advantages possible in terms of fairness for these tests.

The reason for choosing a different version of CCleaner was mostly driven by the fact that there seems to be a version of the said product which does not include advertisement toolbars attached.

Since jv16 PowerTools is all about no bloatware, no adware and no spyware attached to its installer ever in its history of being a PC System Utilities suite, we decided to test a similar version of CCleaner, that is supposed to not contain ads or any toolbars attached.

For the above reasons, we choose to take a closer look at this product and included CCleaner – Slim instead of CCleaner – Professional in this weekly test report.

Test Cases involving PCMark 10 Benchmark

The objective of this test was set to record the PCMark 10 benchmark scores of a virtual Windows 10 computer with some of the most common 3rd party applications installed, under the following test case scenarios:

  • Test Case #1: Before installing an using any of the third party common software (Windows 10 fresh)
  • Test Case #2: Before installing and using any of the tested PC system utilities (Windows 10 fresh + common software installed)
  • Test Case #3: With third party software installed, after installing and using CCleaner – Slim
  • Test Case #4: With third party software installed, after installing and using jv16 PowerTools 2017
pcmark10 benchmark windows 10

PCMark 10 Benchmark: Test Environment

The current benchmark test was performed using an Oracle VirtualBox (version: 5.1.22 r115126) virtual environment running Windows 10 with 4 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM assigned. Said virtual machine was run on a host computer running Ubuntu Linux 17.04 LTS (64 bit) with an Intel-i5 processor, 20 GB of DDR3 virtual memory and a SSD system disk.

Such an ordinary test environment was created and used in order to simulate the easiest conditions that can be reproduced by any consumer to verify the validity of these tests.

Using high-end hardware or complex distributed system may result in more professional test methods but may also return test results that are only applicable in an uncommon environment (test lab which does not reflect a real world use case).

For the future, we will also approach this from the ISO point of view. For now, trying to keep it simple while educating consumers about their options is our primary objective.

It seems that on a freshly installed Windows 10 virtual machine, with all of the Oracle VirtualBox Guest Additions installed (for DirectX compatibility and other simulated operating system features), PCMark 10 does not have any compatible benchmark in store.

The reason for this issue is that our virtual test environment is based on hardware that does not have an OpenGL 4.3 compatible GPU.

Alternatives for PCMark 10 benchmark software

As the latest version of PCMark 10 Benchmark software has proven to be unavailable to benchmark a Windows 10 appliance that does not have an OpenGL 4.3 compatible GPU installed, we started looking for alternatives. Using a simple Google search, we stumbled upon the following PCMark 10 alternatives:

PassMark PerformanceTest benchmarks the speed of your PC computer hardware, then compares the result to other machines. Includes disk, 3D and CPU tests.

Phoronix Test Suite is a free, open-source benchmark software for Linux and other operating systems developed by Phoronix Media.

UserBenchmark is a free all-in-one benchmarking application. Benchmark your CPU, GPU, SSD, HDD and USB Drives then compare results with other users and see which parts you can upgrade together with the expected performance improvements.

Having at our disposal the above alternatives to PCMark 10, we decided to use the benchmark software that promises on their official website (at first sight) to deliver results in the fastest time possible.

For this reason, due to its slogan (“Speed test your PC in less than a minute”), we decided to use UserBenchmark as an alternative to PCMark 10’s requirement for an OpenGL 4.3 compatible GPU to be mounted on the tested system.

PC System Benchmarks: Verifiability

All of the past and current test results are accompanied by screenshots and/or video recordings which have been saved during various testing phases in order to address some of the most common test result credibility concerns for this type of studies.

Test Case #1: Summary

→ on a freshly installed Windows 10 with no third party software

In the first test case we measured the UserBenchMark score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose.

We did not yet install any of the most common software used today. The reason for this extra benchmark score (before installing any other third party software products) is to determine a baseline benchmark score for a freshly installed Windows 10, according to the UserBenchMark testing software.

As mentioned before, UserBenchMark was used as an alternative to the PCMark 10 benchmark due to lack of support on our test machine for an OpenGL 4.3 compatible GPU.

A complete PCMark 10 benchmark will be done later for the same purposes, in a similar environment, this time with an OpenGL 4.3 compatible graphics card installed (in order to obtain the best results).

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #1

On a freshly installed and updated Windows 10, UserBenchMark has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • CPU Benchmark score: 58.8
  • SSD Bechmark score: 121.1
pcmark 10 benchmark alternative

Test Case #2: Summary

→ on a freshly installed Windows 10 with common software and antivirus monitoring enabled

In the first test case we measured the UserBenchMark score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose.

In the second test case of this week, we recorded the UserBenchMark score for a Windows 10 system with some of the most common and/or popular software installed.

This week, we also included Avast Free Antivirus in the installed popular software. The purpose of this antivirus live monitor being installed and enabled is to see how much of an influence it will have on the CPU benchmark score calculated by UserBenchMark.

The system in this test case was neither cleaned or optimized using any of the tested PC System Utilities (CCleaner, jv16 PowerTools 2017).

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #2

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed and an antivirus live monitoring engine enabled, UserBenchMark has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • CPU Benchmark score: 42.5
  • SSD Bechmark score: 118

Test Case #3: Summary

→ after cleaning and optimizing using CCleaner – Slim (without browser advertisements toolbar)

In the first test and second test cases, we measured the UserBenchMark score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose, with and without third party common software installed.

In the third test case of this week, we recorded the UserBenchMark score for a Windows 10 system with some of the most common and/or popular software installed, after being cleaned with CCleaner.

The system in this test case was cleaned and optimized using CCleaner – Slim for the reason that we learned that this version may not include browser toolbars and other advertisement components that may be rather resource consuming and user annoying, as possibly do other versions of CCleaner, as advertised by its publisher.

Unfortunately, we have been unable to properly run CCleaner – Slim after it has been installed due to the fact that the application crashed. This issue seemed to go away only after the system was rebooted. Possibly, the live monitoring engine of CCleaner had some trouble starting the first time.

Once the test system was hard rebooted, CCleaner – Slim run successfully and was able to clean some temporary files off the hard-disk. The total volume of data removed equaled 329 MB. Its registry cleaner component also found 53 registry issues that needed fixing.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #3

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed and an antivirus live monitoring engine enabled, after the system was cleaned and optimized using CCleaner – Slim, UserBenchMark has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • CPU Benchmark score: 61
  • SSD Bechmark score: 34.6

Test Case #4: Summary

→ after cleaning and optimizing using jv16 PowerTools 2017 (no adware, no spyware, no toolbars)

In the first test and second test cases, we measured the UserBenchMark score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose, with and without third party common software installed.

In the fourth test case of this week, we recorded the UserBenchMark score for a Windows 10 system with some of the most common and/or popular software installed, after being cleaned with jv16 PowerTools 2017.

The system in this test case was cleaned and optimized using jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.1.0.1728.

Based on instructions displayed by jv16 PowerTools, the system was rebooted. This allows registry keys that could not be fixed during normal operating system operation to be addressed. Also, during the first reboot after using Clean and SpeedUp My Computer tool, if you have run it using its default settings, the Registry Compactor tool will also be executed.

This should provide faster access to common registry keys after jv16 PowerTools has completed compressing all of the registry hives.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #4

On a Windows 10 operating system with most common software installed and an antivirus live monitoring engine enabled, after the system was cleaned and optimized using jv16 PowerTools 2017 v.4.1.0.1728, UserBenchMark has calculated the following PC system benchmark scores:

  • CPU Benchmark score: 62
  • SSD Bechmark score: 28.6

PCMark 10 Benchmark: conclusions

The first thing that struck us is the big difference in UserBenchMark score for the SSD disk before and after using either CCleaner or jv16 PowerTools.

According to UserBenchMark’s algorithm to calculate this type of score, the system ranked 60% poorer in terms of file system access speed after using either CCleaner or jv16 PowerTools. This could be a side effect of the live monitoring agents of both products (to be determined in later test cases).

A test will be carried out in the future to determine the benchmark score of a Windows 10 system with and without live monitoring agents enabled by the PC System Utilities tested in order to address this concern.

CPU Benchmark SSD Benchmark
Windows 10 fresh 58.8 121.1
Windows 10 fresh + common software 42.5 118
Windows 10 cleaned with Ccleaner 61 34.6
Windows 10 cleaned with jv16 PowerTools 62 28.6

For one of the next weekly testing routines, we will get an OpenGL 4.3 compatible GPU in order to be able to run the complete battery of tests included with the latest PCMark 10 benchmark.

As past results alone are not necessarily the best way to guarantee future events, we do plan to correlate results from previous weekly benchmark tests and find a reasonable way to average them for a more clear impression on the effect that popular PC system utilities have on the operating system.

Related weekly benchmark test reports:

Other historical benchmark test reports:

Since February of 2009 (when the first test of this kind was done in our lab), Macecraft Software has published a total of seven registry cleaner product comparison studies:

PC System Benchmarks – Software Testing Weekly #2

By | blog, pc optimization expert

Introducing PC System Benchmarks

PC system benchmarks are a good method to identify potential bottlenecks in your computing performance and choose effective system upgrades. As there are several types of different PC system benchmarks, our focus has always been on those that provide scripted test scenarios inspired from real world use cases.

In March of 2015 we set off to test what various software products were doing to our computers. In this study, 133 products were tested. The inclusion process was simple and straightforward: few software download sites were manually scanned for any products claiming to make your computer faster by cleaning it or by fixing system errors.

In October of 2016 we tested the top ten registry cleaners. The products tested were chosen simply with a Google search of Windows registry cleaners and the top ten results were picked.

In January of 2017 PC system benchmarks were performed to determine the best registry cleaner from a selection of the top three which previously ranked best.

This week, as we have just released jv16 PowerTools 2017 version 4.1.0.1728, our interest for PC system benchmarks was reborn.

registry cleaner

Why this test now?

Today is supposed that PCMark 10 will be released for public use.

As it has been quite a while since PCMark 8 has been the standard in PC system benchmarking, we wish to celebrate the upcoming public release of PCMark 10 this week with a Windows 10 benchmarking test report done using PCMark 8, before and after using popular PC system utilities.

Since PCMark 8 is not necessarily fully compatible with Windows 10 benchmarking methods, we expect surprising results and some enticing conclusions that may lead us to further test cases for next week’s lab report.

Once PCMark 10 will be released, the conclusions of this micro test will be used to compose the test cases for a much wider study involving more software products that promise to clean and speed-up your computer.

If at the time of reading this report PCMark 10 has been already released, then you can freely benchmark your computer using this software for free in the same way that we did in our lab with PCMark 8.

To download PCMark 10, visit: https://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/pcmark10/. We would love to know your results, so don’t hesitate to join the discussion about this topic on the forum.

Tested Products

To start, we looked at the top competitor (according to Google.com search results for “registry cleaner”) and decided to see the PC system benchmarks score impact (if any) before and after using the said product: CCleaner.

In order to learn the most from this experience, we downloaded the free, professional trial of CCleaner in order to evaluate this software from the best angle possible.

As far as we know, this version is supposed to be fully featured, including an active background system monitoring service – which may or may not have an impact on the overall PC system benchmarks score given by PCMark 8 – to be determined.

Test Cases involving PC System Benchmarks

The objective of this test was set to record the virtual PC system benchmarks score given by PCMark 8 on Windows 10 with some of the most common 3rd party applications installed:

  • Before installing and using any of the tested PC system utilities
  • After installing and using CCleaner – Professional
  • After installing and using jv16 PowerTools 2017
pcmark8 windows 10

PC System Benchmarks Test Environment

The current benchmark test was performed using an Oracle VirtualBox (version: 5.1.22 r115126) virtual environment running Windows 10 with 4 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM assigned.

In order to ensure that no system updates or other updates are downloaded during the testing procedure, the system was disconnected from the Internet before starting each PC system benchmarks test set.

The virtual machine was run on a host computer running Ubuntu Linux 17.04 LTS (64 bit) with an Intel-i5 processor, 20 GB of DDR3 virtual memory and a SSD system disk.

Such an ordinary test environment was created and used in order to simulate the easiest conditions that can be reproduced by any consumer to verify the validity of these tests.

Using high-end hardware or complex distributed system may result in more professional test methods but may also return test results that are only applicable in an uncommon environment (test lab which does not reflect a real world use case).

For the future, we will also approach this from the ISO point of view. For now, trying to keep it simple while educating consumers about their options is our primary objective.

PC System Benchmarks: Verifiability

All of the past and current test results are accompanied by screenshots and video recordings which have been saved during various testing phases in order to address some of the most common test result credibility concerns for this type of studies.

ninite software installer

Test Case #1: Summary

In the first test case we measured the PCMark 8 PC system benchmarks score for a virtual Windows 10 system that was freshly installed and updated for this purpose.

In this environment, we installed the most common software used today, according to ninite.com. This wonderful tool allows you to quickly install or update multiple commonly used software at the same time, either on a local end-point or even across the network.

Once all the software has been installed, the virtual machine state was saved and we used this state of the operating system as a benchmark point of comparison (without any PC system utilities installed or used on the machine before measuring its baseline PC Mark 8 score).

pcmark 8 windows 10

In order to measure baseline performance, we run the free, conventional test offered by PCMark 8. This test is advertised as being the standard for common home computing tests.

The first of a total of six tests that PCMark 8 does is a scripted scenario in which the PC system benchmark score is measured while simulated social networks are automatically browsed by the benchmarking software.

During this automated test, no user interaction is needed as it is not recommended to use the system which is being benchmarked at the same time that tests are running.

In the second test system performance is measured while browsing for items to buy from an online retailer.

The third test addresses the common use case scenario of editing content using a word processor.

In the following test PCMark 8 measures overall system performance during a simulated video conferencing session.

Finally PCMark 8 helps to determine the PC system benchmark score while the computer is being used for photo editing.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #1

On Windows 10, without cleaning or optimizing the system with any PC system utilities, PCMark 8 has calculated a PC system benchmark score of 1060.

Here are the individual score values allocated to each of the tests:

  • Writing 5.51557 s
  • Video Chat encoding v2 Conventional 237.00000 ms
  • Web Browsing – JunglePin 0.44450 s
  • Casual Gaming 0.70 fps
  • Advanced Photo Editing1 Conventional 0.98143 s
  • Web Browsing – Amazonia 0.16620 s
  • Video Chat playback 1 v2 Conventional 20.01 fps

The total PCMark 8 Home Conventional Score for this test case was 1060.

Video recording of the PC system benchmarks done on Windows 10.

Test Case #2: Summary

In the second test case, the previously saved Windows 10 snapshot (with most common 3rd party software installed) has been cleaned and optimized using this week’s tested PC system utilities.

pc system benchmarks

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #2.1 (CCleaner – Professional Edition v.5.31.6105)

After cleaning the Windows 10 test system with CCleaner – Professional Edition (Registry Cleaner) a total of 53 registry problems were fixed.

After cleaning the Windows 10 test system with CCleaner – Professional Edition (File Cleaner) a total of 400 megabytes of disk space were cleaned.

On Windows 10, after cleaning and optimizing the operating system using CCleaner – Professional EditionPCMark 8 has calculated a PC system benchmark score of 1016.

Here are the individual score values allocated to each of the tests:

  • Writing 5.72957 s
  • Video Chat encoding v2 Conventional 284.00000 ms
  • Web Browsing – JunglePin 0.45689 s
  • Casual Gaming 0.69 fps
  • Advanced Photo Editing1 Conventional 1.02341 s
  • Web Browsing – Amazonia 0.17674 s
  • Video Chat playback 1 v2 Conventional 18.03 fps

The total PCMark 8 Home Conventional Score for this test case was 1016.

Video recording saved while measuring the PCMark 8 PC system benchmark score after cleaning and optimizing Windows 10 with CCleaner – Professional Edition.

PC System Benchmark Results: Test Case #2.2 (jv16 PowerTools 2017 v.4.1.0.1728)

After cleaning the Windows 10 test system with jv16 PowerTools 2017 a total of 83 file and registry related problems were fixed. More detailed statistics are available when using the software’s dedicated tools. For the purpose of this test, we used the Clean and SpeedUp My Computer tool.

This tool was designed to automatically use multiple other tools packed into jv16 PowerTools (such as the Startup Optimizer and Registry Compactor) in order to both clean and optimize a system’s performance.

On Windows 10, after cleaning and optimizing the operating system using jv16 PowerToolsPCMark 8 has calculated a PC system benchmark score of 1030.

Here are the individual score values allocated to each of the tests:

  • Writing 5.57387 s
  • Video Chat encoding v2 Conventional 277.33333 ms
  • Web Browsing – JunglePin 0.46557 s
  • Casual Gaming 0.70 fps
  • Advanced Photo Editing1 Conventional 0.97845 s
  • Web Browsing – Amazonia 0.17018 s
  • Video Chat playback 1 v2 Conventional 17.01 fps

The total PCMark 8 Home Conventional Score for this test case was 1030.

Video recording saved while measuring the PCMark 8 PC system benchmark score after cleaning and optimizing Windows 10 with jv16 PowerTools 2017.

PC System Benchmarks (micro testing): conclusions lead to wider tests

After cleaning the Windows 10 operating system with either CCleaner – Professional Edition or jv16 PowerTools 2017, the PCMark 8 PC system benchmark score was lower than before using any PC system utilities to clean the operating system in the first place.

This result is not surprising for us at all, considering that both of the tested registry cleaners attach a resident process to the system in order to monitor the operating system’s health and overall performance.

How can the operating system get a lower PCMark 8 benchmark score after it has been cleaned?

Most likely, the reason for the lower score obtained by the operating system after being cleaned with each of the tested products in comparison to the baseline test score is because of an extra running background process in both cases, however, this is just an assumption at this level.

In order to clarify this assumption, more extensive tests will be carried out in the near future, with and without background monitoring services enabled for either jv16 PowerTools and any other similar interest software product that we can easily find using a simple search on Google.com

With PCMark 10 pending release later today, we wish to do a similar test case scenario next week and hopefully compare the results between PCMark 8 and PCMark 10.

Results should vary as PCMark 10 has been specifically designed to become the industry standard for benchmarking Windows 10 operating systems, as PCMark 8 has been for a long time in regards to Windows 8 and Windows 8.1.

What do we expect to see in the next PC system benchmarks done on Windows 10 with PCMark 10?

First of all, we expect PCMark 10 to be far more compatible and capable to measure small differences of Windows 10 performance before and after certain actions have been performed in the test environment.

As PCMark 8 was not necessarily designed to manage Windows 10 after its latest updates, we expect this to improve with the latest release of PCMark later today.

For the start of the next week, our weekly software testing report will most likely include a preview of PCMark 10 and the scores obtained by a Windows 10 virtual environment before and after cleaning it with popular pc system utilities.

Related weekly benchmark test reports:

Other historical benchmark test reports:

Since February of 2009 (when the first test of this kind was done in our lab), Macecraft Software has published a total of seven registry cleaner product comparison studies: